| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Shaffx95
Joined: 16 Aug 2010
Posts: 795
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:46 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
I would like to nominate my own choke too (GH:SH Raining Blood, missed the 5-note chord), but i don't have a proof (is it required?). I screamed so loud when i missed, that i'm ashamed to upload the vid to youtube.
_________________
  
  
The Rock Band Master FC Breakdown Project: RB1 RB2
My Youtube Account: Click Here |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
expertwin 
Joined: 18 Mar 2010
Posts: 2244
Location: Meh.
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shaffx95 wrote: |
I would like to nominate my own choke too (GH:SH Raining Blood, missed the 5-note chord), but i don't have a proof (is it required?). I screamed so loud when i missed, that i'm ashamed to upload the vid to youtube. |
Yes, it is required. However, if you don't have any strikes against you on YT, you can make it "Unlisted." If you do have strikes however, you still have to upload the video if you want to nominate it.
_________________
Does not leave my sig until Chrisssss FCs TDWF on Hard Bass.
Does not leave my sig until dramacomic FCs Indians on Expert Bass.
2015/09/20 The date I became Free Bird #200
 
 
@ataeaf=My Twitter. RB Accomps. GH Accomps. Nobody reads them.
| voidedalive2x wrote: | | of COURSE it's doable, you ninny! Don't you cop out on me now! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nyumi
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 159
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yksi-kaksi-kolme
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 2803
Location: philly skramzzzz
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 3:58 am Post subject: Re: The Annual Scorehero "Best of 2010" Awards |
|
|
| Nyumi wrote: | | Best Guitar Accomplishment of the Decade - Microgamer invents tapping |
Change this to "popularizes tapping" and I'd be good. Someone tapped YRGM Solo A long before MG did Jordan, and someone mentioned tapping Cheat on the Church as far back as March 2006.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MasterNobody
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 2791
Location: Duxbury, MA
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why the bloody hell is this thread tracking accomplishments "of the decade"... this decade ended last year. Don't try to tell me 1960 was a part of the '50s. xP Can we stick to awards for the year please?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ace5993
Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 1920
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MasterNobody wrote: | | Why the bloody hell is this thread tracking accomplishments "of the decade"... this decade ended last year. Don't try to tell me 1960 was a part of the '50s. xP Can we stick to awards for the year please? |
A.D. years start at 1. There is no 0 A.D., or 0 B.C. for that matter, so 2001-2010 is the 201st decade. 0-9 decades are just more convenient to reference (the 00s), but 2001-2010 is the proper 10-year chunk that should be used.
OP is absolutely correct for having decade accomplishment categories. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dave0113 
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 1426
Location: LaGrange, New York
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ace5993 wrote: | | MasterNobody wrote: | | Why the bloody hell is this thread tracking accomplishments "of the decade"... this decade ended last year. Don't try to tell me 1960 was a part of the '50s. xP Can we stick to awards for the year please? |
A.D. years start at 1. There is no 0 A.D., or 0 B.C. for that matter, so 2001-2010 is the 201st decade. 0-9 decades are just more convenient to reference (the 00s), but 2001-2010 is the proper 10-year chunk that should be used.
OP is absolutely correct for having decade accomplishment categories. |
Completely correct. Even though I was only a kid at the time, I got really upset when the media called Y2K ("year 2000" for those of you that aren't familiar with the abbreviation) the start of a new millennium, when it was still part of the then current millennium. 2001 was the start of the new millennium.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ace5993
Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 1920
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dave0113 wrote: | | Completely correct. Even though I was only a kid at the time, I got really upset when the media called Y2K ("year 2000" for those of you that aren't familiar with the abbreviation) the start of a new millennium, when it was still part of the then current millennium. 2001 was the start of the new millennium. |
OMG I was pissed at that as well XD That's one of the only things I remember about it though, I was 6 :p |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MasterNobody
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 2791
Location: Duxbury, MA
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ace5993 wrote: | | MasterNobody wrote: | | Why the bloody hell is this thread tracking accomplishments "of the decade"... this decade ended last year. Don't try to tell me 1960 was a part of the '50s. xP Can we stick to awards for the year please? |
A.D. years start at 1. There is no 0 A.D., or 0 B.C. for that matter, so 2001-2010 is the 201st decade. 0-9 decades are just more convenient to reference (the 00s), but 2001-2010 is the proper 10-year chunk that should be used.
OP is absolutely correct for having decade accomplishment categories. |
Well, I did the "research."
A decade is any period of 10 years. The (20)00's, how I personally and everyone I know keeps track of decades, ended when 2009 ended. I recognize that the 201st decade A.D. has not yet ended, I did not think that was what we were referring to and I apologize for my strong remarks. The OP is right, assuming he is referring to the 201st decade A.D.
That being said, there is no one "proper" way to define a decade you know, just because one definition follows popular media and culture and one follows the Christian calendar doesn't make the one wrong and the other "proper" and the one that "should be used." >______________>
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ace5993
Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 1920
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MasterNobody wrote: | | ace5993 wrote: | | MasterNobody wrote: | | Why the bloody hell is this thread tracking accomplishments "of the decade"... this decade ended last year. Don't try to tell me 1960 was a part of the '50s. xP Can we stick to awards for the year please? |
A.D. years start at 1. There is no 0 A.D., or 0 B.C. for that matter, so 2001-2010 is the 201st decade. 0-9 decades are just more convenient to reference (the 00s), but 2001-2010 is the proper 10-year chunk that should be used.
OP is absolutely correct for having decade accomplishment categories. |
Well, I did the "research."
A decade is any period of 10 years. The (20)00's, how I personally and everyone I know keeps track of decades, ended when 2009 ended. I recognize that the 201st decade A.D. has not yet ended, I did not think that was what we were referring to and I apologize for my strong remarks. The OP is right, assuming he is referring to the 201st decade A.D.
That being said, there is no one "proper" way to define a decade you know, just because one definition follows popular media and culture and one follows the Christian calendar doesn't make the one wrong and the other "proper" and the one that "should be used." >______________> |
I would say the "proper" way is to have one decade start directly after the next one, not to have a period of 9 years and then have the first decade. That seems the most logical way to "keep track of decades", in fact it seems to be the only way that makes sense at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MasterNobody
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 2791
Location: Duxbury, MA
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ace5993 wrote: |
I would say the "proper" way is to have one decade start directly after the next one, not to have a period of 9 years and then have the first decade. That seems the most logical way to "keep track of decades", in fact it seems to be the only way that makes sense at all. |
Yup guys, you heard it first here, ace and a couple other people in this thread are right, the entire popular media and anyone who has ever talked about the "60s", "70s", "80s", and so on is just completely and utterly wrong.
I'm laughing inside at my personal image of VH1's new special, "I Love the 198th Decade, Anno Domini"!
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
superspaz117
Joined: 31 Jul 2009
Posts: 887
Location: Pluto, occasionally hiding from Jesus in the centre of the sun
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well considering the question has been asked and answered before, im just gonna quote them
| superspaz117 wrote: | | blackwidowcd wrote: | | I'm pretty sure 2010 started a new decade. |
well they didn't do a best of the decade last year so..... better late then never  |
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
toymachine 
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 9629
Location: Toronto
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to nominate Marbler's FC of "I Don't Wanna Stop" for best video.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlueTornado
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 2175
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I hope this doesn't go like last year and the polls get abused (this was the RB 2009 awards, but you get the idea).
Well, if you ask me, best guitarist: ukog-monkey.
EDIT: Best Guitar Accomplishment of the Decade: Iamchris4life's TTFaF FC.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FoG
Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 1854
Location: Under A Bridge...
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Best FC of the 200th Decade: Me FCing Sitting On A Chair With My Ass
_________________
 
 
[quote=/"MarkMadness/"]i actually got my china cymbal today and put it on my head and sang china hat[/quote]
My YouTube - My Twitter - My Accomplishments
[quote=/"dudextr/"][10:02:26 PM] xtr: yeah, it''''s too painful now
[10:06:12 PM] xtr: it looks like i have chlamidya[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Copyright © 2006-2024 ScoreHero, LLC
|
Powered by phpBB
|
![Inbox [ Login ]](templates/subSilver/images/icon_mini_message.gif){kind=icon}
Inbox [ Login ]
Search
Memberlist
Profile
Log in
<--- Banner by Olinea
