View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
brooksycc7
Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 194 Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you're doing 3-2-3-3 it's definitely the right path. The only way you could improve it is where to use it at the end, and maybe some squeezes in the middle somewhere, but pretty much only one way to do it. I'm sorry I questioned, I'll FC something before I ask again. _________________
Just a guy looking for some live competition.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frostilicus
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 112 Location: Boston
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks ES! You know, I can't read some words unless they're in bold. How'd you know?
The point was always a trivial one - Brook brought up the logical fact that the point differential between them was too small given the missed notes, and that clearly a fairly higher score was possible. To which b3n replied: "I'm in first place." If he wasn't saying that his path was as good as it gets, then he was just pointing out his ranking. Either he was wrong or it was a non sequitor. No big deal, I'm just a stickler for making a conversation clear (bad habit I get from my past as a debater). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
b3nz0r
Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 972 Location: Harker Heights, TX
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
ES942 wrote: | b3nz0r wrote: | Pretty sure I do have the right path considering I've got first place...
I do 3-2-3-3, yes. |
|
The right path for the first place score. What's so hard to understand here? I'm simply saying my path is superior because my score is higher.
Show me in the dictionary where "right" would absolutely mean "optimal" and couldn't possibly apply to the scores currently on the leaderboard.
and as ES pointed out (since he can read, thanks ES), "pretty sure" doesn't make it sound like we were dealing with absolutes here in the first place. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frostilicus
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 112 Location: Boston
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is fine, just a disagreement with logic. No use repeating myself, and no worries |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kingofterrors
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 1993 Location: Odenton, MD
|
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Calm down kids |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mrthedude87
Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 56 Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Woo hoo, I 8 starred this song! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zillatron
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 1703 Location: Warren, ME
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for the path im only 2k behind 1st! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
debr5836
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 1159 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
spopt.pl optimized path for cherrypie.mid
File: cherrypie.mid
Solution Path: 3-2-3-3
Estimated Base score 36555
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 140440
Estimated SP Score 53465
Estimated Total Score 193905
Activations:
From meas 16.4375 (R note) to meas 22.0625 (GY note) Score: 12092 ((56.0 + 4.5) * 200 ) (do not fully whammy)
From meas 27.8047 (YO sust) to meas 32.1250 (GY note) Score: 8448 ((38.0 + 4.2) * 200 )
From meas 40.0000 (GY note) to meas 46.6250 (RY note) Score: 12240 ((56.0 + 5.2) * 200 )
From meas 65.6641 (YO sust) to meas 73.6875 (R note) Score: 20685 ((97.0 + 6.4) * 200 ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
debr5836
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 1159 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: spopt2.pl results |
|
|
spopt2.pl results for "Cherry Pie" (gh2-ps2/expert) generated on 07/20/2007
lazy-whammy (193221) PNG TXT
no-squeeze (193701) PNG TXT
big-squeeze (194129) PNG TXT
nearly-ideal (194153) PNG TXT
upper-bound (194445) PNG TXT
KEY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lazy Whammy ---- No squeezing, all whammys start 0.5 beats late
No Squeeze ---- No squeezing, no early whammying
Big Squeeze ---- 80% of the max possible squeeze, no early whammying
Nearly Ideal ---- 80% of the max possible squeeze, 80% of the max possible early whammying
Upper Bound ---- 100% of the max possible squeeze, 100% of the max possible early whammying
big-squeeze path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: cherrypie.mid
Solution Path: C3-2-3-3
Estimated Base score 36459
Estimated 4* cutoff 72918
Estimated 5* cutoff 102085
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 140625
Estimated SP Score 53504
Estimated Total Score 194129
Activations:
#1 From meas 16.4375 (R note) to meas 22.0625 (GY note) ( 16.0859- 22.4141) Score: 12112 (56.0+ 4.6)*200
#2 From meas 27.8241 (YO sust) to meas 32.1250 (GY note) ( 27.8241- 32.1021) Score: 8440 (38.0+ 4.2)*200
#3 From meas 40.0000 (GY note) to meas 46.6250 (RY note) ( 40.0027- 46.6016) Score: 12256 (56.0+ 5.3)*200
#4 From meas 65.6651 (YO sust) to meas 73.6875 (R note) ( 65.6651- 73.6651) Score: 20696 (97.0+ 6.5)*200
nearly-ideal path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: cherrypie.mid
Solution Path: C3-2-3-3
Estimated Base score 36459
Estimated 4* cutoff 72918
Estimated 5* cutoff 102085
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 140625
Estimated SP Score 53528
Estimated Total Score 194153
Activations:
#1 From meas 16.4375 (R note) to meas 22.0625 (GY note) ( 16.0859- 22.4141) Score: 12112 (56.0+ 4.6)*200
#2 From meas 27.7989 (YO sust) to meas 32.1250 (GY note) ( 27.7989- 32.1021) Score: 8464 (38.0+ 4.3)*200
#3 From meas 40.0000 (GY note) to meas 46.6250 (RY note) ( 39.9990- 46.6240) Score: 12256 (56.0+ 5.3)*200
#4 From meas 65.6651 (YO sust) to meas 73.6875 (R note) ( 65.6651- 73.6651) Score: 20696 (97.0+ 6.5)*200
upper-bound path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: cherrypie.mid
Solution Path: C3-2-3-3
Estimated Base score 36459
Estimated 4* cutoff 72918
Estimated 5* cutoff 102085
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 140625
Estimated SP Score 53820
Estimated Total Score 194445
Activations:
#1 From meas 16.4375 (R note) to meas 22.0625 (GY note) ( 16.0922- 22.4078) Score: 12112 (56.0+ 4.6)*200
#2 From meas 28.0000 (GY note) to meas 32.5000 (RY note) ( 28.0075- 32.4708) Score: 8752 (40.0+ 3.8)*200
#3 From meas 40.0000 (GY note) to meas 46.6250 (RY note) ( 39.9944- 46.6260) Score: 12256 (56.0+ 5.3)*200
#4 From meas 65.6589 (YO sust) to meas 73.6875 (R note) ( 65.6589- 73.6589) Score: 20700 (97.0+ 6.5)*200
Please post any bugs/questions about these auto-generated paths HERE. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|