View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JPrez44
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 1085 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
RStah44 wrote: | Yeah, JPrez44 your damn slow.... but atleast your helping cwo04 out with some charts. I'm slowly working on medium and mostly working on hard.
By the way "The New Black" FC! damn this just keeps getting easier and easier. |
Pfftt.. HEY MAMA, LOOK WHAT I CAN DO!
The New Black - Hard (8th) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RStah44
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 609 Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't look up the path for the new black by the way. Oh and grow a pair before talking to john. _________________
My Goals Before Gh3 Comes Out:
[X] 300k Jordan(Expert)
[X] 5* Six(Expert)
[X] Rank Top 500 in Expert
Leagues:
S5 B-league- 2nd Regular Season- Quarter Finalist in Playoffs
S6 OB-league- 15th Regular Season- Round 1 Finalist in Playoffs
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
debr5836
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 1159 Location: Fort Collins, CO
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 11:52 pm Post subject: spopt2.pl results |
|
|
spopt2.pl results for "Mother" (gh2-ps2/easy) generated on 07/20/2007
NOTE: Easy squeeze interval of +/- 0.1667s is still in question.
This could result in optimistic results.
lazy-whammy (86174) PNG TXT
no-squeeze (88795) PNG TXT
big-squeeze (89307) PNG TXT
nearly-ideal (90216) PNG TXT
upper-bound (90604) PNG TXT
KEY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lazy Whammy ---- No squeezing, all whammys start 0.5 beats late
No Squeeze ---- No squeezing, no early whammying
Big Squeeze ---- 80% of the max possible squeeze, no early whammying
Nearly Ideal ---- 80% of the max possible squeeze, 80% of the max possible early whammying
Upper Bound ---- 100% of the max possible squeeze, 100% of the max possible early whammying
big-squeeze path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: mother.mid
Solution Path: 2-2-2-2-1-2-2
Estimated Base score 18025
Estimated 4* cutoff 36050
Estimated 5* cutoff 50470
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 66507
Estimated SP Score 22800
Estimated Total Score 89307
Activations:
#1 From meas 20.3750 (R note) to meas 26.5734 (R sust) ( 20.4490- 26.5734) Score: 3364 (12.5+ 4.3)*200
#2 From meas 42.0000 (Y note) to meas 47.5000 (G note) ( 42.0282- 47.4193) Score: 3628 (12.0+ 6.1)*200
#3 From meas 70.0000 (Y note) to meas 74.6112 (R sust) ( 70.0823- 74.6112) Score: 2948 (10.0+ 4.7)*200
#4 From meas 84.0000 (Y note) to meas 89.3412 (G sust) ( 84.0823- 89.3412) Score: 3380 (11.0+ 5.9)*200
#5 From meas 92.8750 (R note) to meas 97.1528 (R sust) ( 92.9573- 97.1528) Score: 2712 ( 9.0+ 4.6)*200
#6 From meas 107.6250 (R note) to meas 113.0000 (Y note) (107.6541-112.9141) Score: 3296 (14.0+ 2.5)*200
#7 From meas 119.1875 (Y note) to meas 124.6250 (Y note) (118.9660-124.6260) Score: 3472 (12.0+ 5.4)*200
nearly-ideal path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: mother.mid
Solution Path: 2-2-2-2-1-2-2
Estimated Base score 18025
Estimated 4* cutoff 36050
Estimated 5* cutoff 50470
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 66507
Estimated SP Score 23709
Estimated Total Score 90216
Activations:
#1 From meas 19.8750 (G note) to meas 26.3750 (R note) ( 19.8838- 26.3010) Score: 3509 (13.2+ 4.3)*200
#2 From meas 42.0000 (Y note) to meas 47.8750 (R note) ( 42.0766- 47.8049) Score: 3828 (13.0+ 6.1)*200
#3 From meas 72.5000 (R note) to meas 77.2500 (Y note) ( 72.5435- 77.2479) Score: 3076 (11.0+ 4.4)*200
#4 From meas 84.0000 (Y note) to meas 89.5712 (G sust) ( 84.0823- 89.5712) Score: 3468 (11.0+ 6.3)*200
#5 From meas 93.8750 (Y note) to meas 98.2500 (Y note) ( 93.9578- 98.2439) Score: 2876 (10.0+ 4.4)*200
#6 From meas 107.6250 (R note) to meas 113.0000 (Y note) (107.5116-113.0010) Score: 3296 (14.0+ 2.5)*200
#7 From meas 121.0625 (Y note) to meas 127.0366 (G sust) (121.1516-127.0366) Score: 3656 (12.0+ 6.3)*200
upper-bound path details
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
File: mother.mid
Solution Path: 2-2-2-2-1-2-2
Estimated Base score 18025
Estimated 4* cutoff 36050
Estimated 5* cutoff 50470
Estimated Perfect w/o SP 66507
Estimated SP Score 24097
Estimated Total Score 90604
Activations:
#1 From meas 19.8750 (G note) to meas 26.4238 (R sust) ( 19.9677- 26.4238) Score: 3525 (13.2+ 4.4)*200
#2 From meas 42.0000 (Y note) to meas 47.9092 (R sust) ( 42.0958- 47.9092) Score: 3840 (13.0+ 6.2)*200
#3 From meas 70.0000 (Y note) to meas 74.8750 (G note) ( 70.1031- 74.8520) Score: 3228 (11.0+ 5.1)*200
#4 From meas 84.0000 (Y note) to meas 89.6148 (G sust) ( 84.1031- 89.6148) Score: 3488 (11.0+ 6.4)*200
#5 From meas 92.0000 (G note) to meas 96.5000 (G note) ( 92.0859- 96.3943) Score: 2924 (10.0+ 4.6)*200
#6 From meas 107.6250 (R note) to meas 113.0000 (Y note) (107.4883-113.0010) Score: 3296 (14.0+ 2.5)*200
#7 From meas 120.1875 (R note) to meas 126.3125 (G note) (120.2984-126.2307) Score: 3796 (14.0+ 5.0)*200
Please post any bugs/questions about these auto-generated paths HERE. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JPrez44
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 1085 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jesus christ, this upper bound squeezing is like what i get 1 of 50 times. Ridiculous. I bet you its Hard for CDW TO GET SOME OF THESE! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cwo04
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 1351 Location: Stoney Creek
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thats why I'm using the Big Squeeze paths lol _________________
thedrunkenkovinc wrote: | "That IS how ScoreHero...much more than WoWHero...fucking pussy WoW......do it." |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JPrez44
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 1085 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nearly-ideal for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cdw01
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 923 Location: New York
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
JPrez44 wrote: | nearly-ideal for me. | Quite frankly, even some of the nearly ideal squeezes on easy are impossible. debr's looking into it because the other difficulties look much more accurate. _________________
Last edited by Cdw01 on Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:03 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JPrez44
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 1085 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
You know, thats correct, i'll be looking close at that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|