| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JCirri
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 4576
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:13 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Note Chart |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PriestMLH
Joined: 19 Sep 2006
Posts: 1958
Location: Evansville, IN
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Any ideas on this one? Getting ready to the video for this one and I haven't got a clue since it isn't very note heavy in spots..best I could come up with was:
2 - right away
3 - 3rd yellow in 69
2 - right away
2 - right away
That's just first glance...I'm really bad at songs like these.
_________________
I'm alive I promise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TrouT
Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Posts: 306
Location: Minnesota
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| well you have to remember on songs like this one where there aren't large sporadic note spasms every minute or so, that just making sure you're using SP efficiently is good enough. 2-3-2-2 is what i use.. there isn't many other ways you can do it without overloading your SP meter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chuckleslovakian 
Joined: 01 Nov 2006
Posts: 445
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 2-3-2-3 looks to be better than 2-3-2-2. But Hsatakeit told me 2-2-2-2-2 is better, so I could be wrong. But according to my calculations 2-3-2-3 is about 1000 points better than 2-2-2-2-2 so I doubt it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mattk3650
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 82
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
optimal 2-2-2-2-2 all immediate
Edit: Sorry guys i saw a vid on youtube and it was real crappy so i couldnt tell very well i thought it was optimal because it was like top 10 at the time
Last edited by mattk3650 on Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Piso
Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 417
Location: Long Island... owait, Vancouver Island... Yep, Vancouver Island.
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mattk3650 wrote: | | optimal 2-2-2-2-2 all immediate |
Just... no...
3-2-2-3
3: Next note
2: Third orange in 71
2: Next note
3: First R in 131
_________________
Welcome, Piso. Your last login was Sep. 6, 2009, 1:41AM. - From April 25th, 2010. Hihi.
My GH2 co-op paths hosting
10:56 JR626-1 : i'm half retarded now
10:56 jaimeclaude : now?
10:56 psxfreak101 : only half?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chuckleslovakian
Joined: 01 Nov 2006
Posts: 445
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Piso wrote: | | mattk3650 wrote: | | optimal 2-2-2-2-2 all immediate |
Just... no...
3-2-2-3
3: Next note
2: Third orange in 71
2: Next note
3: First R in 131 |
Not sure if 3-2-2-3 or 2-3-2-3 is better. But is the last activation really on the first R in 131? When activated on the next note, I had the last activation ending practically as soon as the hold in 139 started. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rockmaninoff
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 113
Location: Springfield/Charlottesville, VA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chuckleslovakian wrote: | | Piso wrote: | | mattk3650 wrote: | | optimal 2-2-2-2-2 all immediate |
Just... no...
3-2-2-3
3: Next note
2: Third orange in 71
2: Next note
3: First R in 131 |
Not sure if 3-2-2-3 or 2-3-2-3 is better. But is the last activation really on the first R in 131? When activated on the next note, I had the last activation ending practically as soon as the hold in 139 started. |
Just FC'd this song using this path, currently in 5th place. I activated on the first Blue note, not the first Red, and it got me through that ending hold.
Not sure what the optimal path is, but thanks for this one. The activations are easy and it looks like it maximizes points.
Cheers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
batsmak
Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 853
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Piso's got it, unless you are an uber squeezer, in which case squeeze as much as you can on the 1st blue note in 131 and it will cut out at the blue hold in 139.
_________________
Until I'm bored and/or find a good quote, this is my signiture! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RDTopaque07
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 261
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
3: Next note
2: Third orange in 71
2: next red
3: First R in 131
I think that makes it 200 points higher.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MABwannabe
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mattk3650 that is the funniest goddamn sig i have ever seen.. i spit snapple out of my mouth during the Oh Noes!.. and "i'm not rezing you again" part
that was amazing. what did you use to edit that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mattk3650
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 82
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wow 200 point difference that is weird |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crapmonkey
Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RDTopaque07 wrote: | 3: Next note
2: Third orange in 71
2: next red
3: First R in 131
I think that makes it 200 points higher. |
Yep, this is the one, bumped up my score 25K |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
batsmak
Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 853
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crapmonkey wrote: | | RDTopaque07 wrote: | 3: Next note
2: Third orange in 71
2: next red
3: First R in 131
I think that makes it 200 points higher. |
Yep, this is the one, bumped up my score 25K |
No... You get 1 chord for a chord and a note...
_________________
Until I'm bored and/or find a good quote, this is my signiture! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SalmonSnak3
Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 52
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yep.. this is the right one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![Inbox [ Login ]](templates/subSilver/images/icon_mini_message.gif){kind=icon}
Inbox [ Login ]
Search
Memberlist
Profile
Log in
