View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JCirri
Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 4576
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Note Chart |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sully
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 4570 Location: Tampa, FL
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
FinalAeon
Joined: 19 Mar 2007 Posts: 2915 Location: Antwerpen, Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was going to say 3-3 is better since I had a 255800 run with a miss outside SP but my FC run was only 258800. So either my FC run was crap in terms of squeezing or Sully's path is just better. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hi7
Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 277 Location: Stoney Creek, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Which is the better path? Anyone? _________________
Torchy wrote: | Pure fucking Nintendium, baby. Indestructible. |
Goals:
6* Hard (TTFAF) [ ]
7* Hard [ ]
65 Hard FC's [ ]
45 Expert FC's [ ] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrianBAM19
Joined: 05 May 2007 Posts: 2804 Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sully's path is right. Using his got me 260173, which is maybe 2 or 3 ticks away from optimal(and this better be 1st for the leagues). _________________
KoE wrote: | <KoE> she wanted to put the BAM in brianbam. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheMagician
Joined: 05 Mar 2007 Posts: 1164
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
BrianBAM19 wrote: | Sully's path is right. Using his got me 260173, which is maybe 2 or 3 ticks away from optimal(and this better be 1st for the leagues). |
260165 is optimal according to debr's path _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BradBjorkman
Joined: 31 Aug 2007 Posts: 523 Location: Puyallup, WA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gunslinger21
Joined: 13 Sep 2008 Posts: 167 Location: Long Island, New York.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Got 258k with no squeezing, poor wammying, and a alightly late final activation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|