View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BrianBAM19
Joined: 05 May 2007 Posts: 2804 Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, now I'm confused. On JC's chart, all of the measures appear to be in 4/4 time signature. However, some of the measures in debr's chart are in 6/4 time signature. Does someone know which chart is right? I'll try to find out myself which is right, but if someone could tell me which chart is right, then I could really start on finding out the exact activations. _________________
KoE wrote: | <KoE> she wanted to put the BAM in brianbam. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Piso
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 417 Location: Long Island... owait, Vancouver Island... Yep, Vancouver Island.
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BrianBAM19 wrote: | OK, now I'm confused. On JC's chart, all of the measures appear to be in 4/4 time signature. However, some of the measures in debr's chart are in 6/4 time signature. Does someone know which chart is right? I'll try to find out myself which is right, but if someone could tell me which chart is right, then I could really start on finding out the exact activations. |
Debr's. It's also easy in game to distinguish from the fact that SP drains really slowly, despite being such a high-bpm song. _________________
Welcome, Piso. Your last login was Sep. 6, 2009, 1:41AM. - From April 25th, 2010. Hihi.
My GH2 co-op paths hosting
10:56 JR626-1 : i'm half retarded now
10:56 jaimeclaude : now?
10:56 psxfreak101 : only half?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dramacomic Neversoft QA
Joined: 20 Jun 2007 Posts: 1754 Location: Valley Village, CA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BrianBAM19 wrote: | OK, now I'm confused. On JC's chart, all of the measures appear to be in 4/4 time signature. However, some of the measures in debr's chart are in 6/4 time signature. Does someone know which chart is right? I'll try to find out myself which is right, but if someone could tell me which chart is right, then I could really start on finding out the exact activations. |
I think both can be considered correct, just depends on how you want to do the measures, since 2 measures of 6/4 is the same as 3 measures of 4/4.
debr's chart is not in this thread, but I'm pretty sure the 6/4 bits must be the notes in between the sustains, and it sounds more "correct" (not sure what term to use) to put those beats in groups of 6 rather than groups of 4, but 4/4 still works as far as I know, it's just more awkward to count.
In terms of finding the right activation points, you'd probably be better off just finding a certain note you can use, rather than worry about what measure it's in, otherwise just stick to the 4/4 chart and don't worry about the time signature change.
That's just my suggestion, since I've never been able to find optimum paths before. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrianBAM19
Joined: 05 May 2007 Posts: 2804 Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's the optimal path.
2-next note
2-right before measure 45, ends right before the next SP phrase
3-middle of 3rd O, ends right before next SP phrase
2-1st R
2-Y note right before the sweep at measure 129, same amount of points as if you activated right on the sweep, easier to pull off
EDIT:Fixed the second activation.
DOUBLE EDIT:Wait, no I didn't! *facepalm* NOW it's fixed.
TRIPLE EDIT:Fixed some dumb spelling errors. _________________
KoE wrote: | <KoE> she wanted to put the BAM in brianbam. |
Last edited by BrianBAM19 on Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:14 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hi7
Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 277 Location: Stoney Creek, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You just HAD to release that AFTER week 1 _________________
Torchy wrote: | Pure fucking Nintendium, baby. Indestructible. |
Goals:
6* Hard (TTFAF) [ ]
7* Hard [ ]
65 Hard FC's [ ]
45 Expert FC's [ ] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JR626
Joined: 13 Feb 2007 Posts: 1622 Location: Minnesota
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cool, that makes me feel better then. I had the exact same path as BrianBAM, but only FC'd this once with it and missed some important whammying so I didn't get as good of a score. _________________
psxfreak101, regarding jaimeclaude's 1st place league score on BttW wrote: | <psx> not our fault she can squeeze balls to the wall |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
blake7787
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
on the last activation do you mean 169? 159? just not seeing how you can activate it at 129... im sure just a mental error/typo of sorts. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrianBAM19
Joined: 05 May 2007 Posts: 2804 Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blake7787 wrote: | on the last activation do you mean 169? 159? just not seeing how you can activate it at 129... im sure just a mental error/typo of sorts. | Yikes, forgot to point out I was using debr's chart, not JC's. JC's chart doesn't have the correct time signatures, and the measure numbers are off. Look above for the reason why debr's charts are correct. On the last activation, it's measure 129 on debr's chart, and measure 160 on JC's chart.
Anyone wanting to look at debr's chart can look here, since that's whose charts I use.
http://www.bradleyzoo.com/GuitarHero/gh3-ps2/hard/blacksunshine.blank.png
EDIT:dramacomic wrote: | BrianBAM19 wrote: | OK, now I'm confused. On JC's chart, all of the measures appear to be in 4/4 time signature. However, some of the measures in debr's chart are in 6/4 time signature. Does someone know which chart is right? I'll try to find out myself which is right, but if someone could tell me which chart is right, then I could really start on finding out the exact activations. |
In terms of finding the right activation points, you'd probably be better off just finding a certain note you can use, rather than worry about what measure it's in, otherwise just stick to the 4/4 chart and don't worry about the time signature change. | I usually point out a certain note in my paths, but the problem is that I needed to know the correct time signatures to determine where the star power was going to end, especially on the first and 4th activations, where they started in 6/4 time. _________________
KoE wrote: | <KoE> she wanted to put the BAM in brianbam. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hi7
Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 277 Location: Stoney Creek, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
BrianBAM19 wrote: | Here's the optimal path.
2-next note
2-right before measure 65, ends right before the next SP phrase
3-middle of 3rd O, ends rihgt before next SP phrase
2-1st R
2-Y note right before the sweep at measure 129, same amount of points as if you activated right on the sweep, easier to pull off |
I don't understand how you can get 2 SP and activate on 65 for the second activation. If you were to activate on 65 that would net 4 SP's...
Edit: Nevermind. I see you used JCirri's chart for the second activation... You shouldn't switch charts like that. It confuses me _________________
Torchy wrote: | Pure fucking Nintendium, baby. Indestructible. |
Goals:
6* Hard (TTFAF) [ ]
7* Hard [ ]
65 Hard FC's [ ]
45 Expert FC's [ ] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrianBAM19
Joined: 05 May 2007 Posts: 2804 Location: San Antonio, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yikes, not sure why I did that. Fixing right now, thanks for pointing that out.
EDIT:I think that might have just been a typo. On debr's chart, it's right before measure 45, not 65. _________________
KoE wrote: | <KoE> she wanted to put the BAM in brianbam. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
esneky
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 744 Location: Maine
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
"2-right before measure 45, ends right before the next SP phrase"
Just an FYI that you can whammy enough to go over the next SP phrase. I had enough to go over both notes in the phrase but not enough to reach the note after them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobSanders
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 Posts: 335 Location: Why would you like to know?
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What if I'm trying to five star it? Would that still be a good path? Please let me know...... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
smithal3
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 Posts: 539
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BobSanders wrote: | What if I'm trying to five star it? Would that still be a good path? Please let me know...... |
If you are just trying to 5* it then use your SP on any spot where you can keep a 4x (or 8x w/SP) multipier the whole time.
Most of these SP paths are only useful if you assume an FC. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Copyright © 2006-2024 ScoreHero, LLC
|
Powered by phpBB
|