View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Barbaloot 

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 1583
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
La Grange optimal path
I get that going 2-3 at the beginning beats going 3-2 by 200 points, pre-multiplier. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Piso


Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 417 Location: Long Island... owait, Vancouver Island... Yep, Vancouver Island.
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Barbaloot wrote: | La Grange optimal path
I get that going 2-3 at the beginning beats going 3-2 by 200 points, pre-multiplier. |
A slightly easier way of doing the second activation, which eliminates the need to activate on a hopo, is to go 4 notes later on the strummable Y note. Same amount of notes, but just a little less of timing window to work with. _________________
Welcome, Piso. Your last login was Sep. 6, 2009, 1:41AM. - From April 25th, 2010. Hihi.
My GH2 co-op paths hosting
10:56 JR626-1 : i'm half retarded now
10:56 jaimeclaude : now?
10:56 psxfreak101 : only half?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Thurman91


Joined: 28 Dec 2006 Posts: 1165 Location: Bradford, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Piso wrote: | Barbaloot wrote: | La Grange optimal path
I get that going 2-3 at the beginning beats going 3-2 by 200 points, pre-multiplier. |
A slightly easier way of doing the second activation, which eliminates the need to activate on a hopo, is to go 4 notes later on the strummable Y note. Same amount of notes, but just a little less of timing window to work with. |
interesting, could be easier for me to get that 200 im missing. still have first but im not satisfied since i know someone will drop me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Matt276


Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 1242 Location: Princeton, NJ
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Barb, 2-3-3-2 might be slightly better than 2-3-2-3, depending on how much whammy you can get on some of those later phrases. Assuming all whammying is cut off by 1/4 beat at the end of each hold, you can deal with the last 5 phrases like this:
3: Activate on BO in 109, squeeze to G in 116.
2: Activate on R in 130, squeeze to B hold in 137.
This would give you 5370 points, while your last two activations give you 5230. I think the phrase full of 1-beat holds gives you less SP, but if you can get a half bar (oops, I mean 3 bulbs ) from it or very close, you could squeeze from the first R in 131 to the B hold and still get 5270 points. Your path is probably right, but I wanted to point this out to make sure you looked at this possibility. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Barbaloot 

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 1583
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
The way I determined the optimal path was first by assuming you'll want an activation between the fifth and six phrases (which is the densest part of the song), which commits you to either 2-3 or 3-2 for both the first 5 and last 5 phrases. I determined that in each case, 2-3 got more points than 3-2. Finally, I dropped the original assumption, and the only reasonable new path to total up was 2-2-2-2-2, but 2-3-2-3 beat it out by a wide margin. So yes, I did consider the possibility of ending 3-2. Also, I've noticed that when you have lots of small SP whammies, the amount of SP you get tends to be less than what debr's formula predicts, so I doubt getting more whammy than expected from that one phrase is an issue. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BabeMeah

Joined: 28 Nov 2007 Posts: 31 Location: Aurora, Colorado
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
man i need to learn how to squeeze in this songs activations....  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xGHLegendx

Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for the SP path i just FCed it and got 251k i used 2 3 2 3 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jebsax2006


Joined: 04 Jun 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used Barbaloot's path, but only got me 255k. maybe i missed some ticks on that last blue hold, but that is a hard squeeze.
I used Zehmtrioux's path and got me 256176 with good squeezing. I know his path is not optimal considering I did it pretty much perfect, and still not top 10. Where are thoes ticks coming from that gets ppl 256,500+??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Copyright © 2006-2025 ScoreHero, LLC
|
Powered by phpBB
|