View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Phr34k
Joined: 20 Mar 2006 Posts: 1082 Location: London, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Barfo broke my brain with his last post.. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
CapnSpanky
Joined: 08 Jul 2007 Posts: 76 Location: Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now that this has been Implemented succesfully, I think we should be able to have links to the SP paths from the manage scores page. Like "Insert", "Delete", "View", "SP Path". That way, we can finish a song, update our score, and then right away be able to view the SP Paths for the next song to work on. Just a suggestion. Plz don't ban. _________________
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 500 character limit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ownyou17
Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i kno this post might be a long time after the other ones but i waznt sure where to put this so ill put it here. how come with some songs it doesnt automatically calculate you star rating, instead you have to mannually type in a star rating of 3-5. just wondering |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ricecake
Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 1890 Location: Linthicum Heights, MD
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
That happens when the star cutoffs haven't been proven yet. Once one of the cutoffs gets proven, it can be used to calculate the others. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ubermode
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
9*? Has anyone ever achieved a 9* in any song? xD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tma
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1414 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ubermode wrote: | 9*? Has anyone ever achieved a 9* in any song? xD |
No. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheAW333
Joined: 13 Oct 2007 Posts: 443
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really like how this website goes even higher to show you how much better you are than the 5 star cut offs, very cool! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Graf
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 6213 Location: Lanoka Harbor, New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is the guitar hero III extended ratings the same as the gh2 calculations? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fenderstrat806
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 52
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I AM CONFUSED _________________
my Wii gh3 friend code is 4639 7112 9258 add me if u feel like it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DpOblivion
Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 324
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Graf wrote: | is the guitar hero III extended ratings the same as the gh2 calculations? |
I think so. I am kinda new around here, so I'm not 100% certain, but from what I can tell, the 5-star cutoff on GH3 is 2.8 average multiplier, the same as GH2, and the extended ratings are based off of that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rohrk21
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 1434
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sorry if this has been addressed already, but how come some songs give the full star rating while others don't? I take it if it doesn't have its base score and/or 4/5-star cutoff proven, it's impossible to tell its exact star rating? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tma
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1414 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Graf wrote: | is the guitar hero III extended ratings the same as the gh2 calculations? |
Yes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tma
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1414 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
rohrk21 wrote: | I'm sorry if this has been addressed already, but how come some songs give the full star rating while others don't? I take it if it doesn't have its base score and/or 4/5-star cutoff proven, it's impossible to tell its exact star rating? |
Exactly, it's because the cut-off hasn't been proven yet. Feel free to prove it yourself and submit the result. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tma
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1414 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
fenderstrat806 wrote: | I AM CONFUSED |
Try Ritalin. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Venge
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 254 Location: Yuma, Arizona
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JCirri wrote: | Code: |
| | Avg. Mult. | SH Decimal Rating |
| In-game Rating | GH1 | GH2 | GH1 | GH2 |
------------------------------------------------------------
| 4-stars | 2.0x | 2.0x | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| 5-stars | 3.0x | 2.8x | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 6-stars | 4.0x | 3.6x | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| 7-stars | 5.0x | 4.4x | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 8-stars | 6.0x | 5.2x | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 9-stars | 7.0x | 6.0x | 9.0 | 9.0 |
|
|
After reading the 1/8/08 updates in tma's Song Scores, Extended Star Ratings and Cut-Offs FAQ 20080108 it struck me that the math on the GH2/GH3 extended ratings might be faulty. I searched that thread and this one (the only logic places) to see if this has been brought up, so if there's an errant post out there, sorry, but it really should be addressed, either way, in this post.
If the 5* multiplier is 2.8x (40% more than 4*) instead of 3x (50% more) then shouldn't 6* be 3.92x, 7* = 5.488x, 8* = 7.6832x, 9* = 10.75648x? Or working off the GH1:GH2 ratio: 5* = 3.0:2.8 = 15:14 = 93 1/3%. Which would make 6* = 3.72x, 7* = 4.65x, 8* = 5.58x, 9* = 6.51x.
I understand the extended scoring is an arbitrary system we made up ("we" = the "royal" we = JCirri) and that logic doesn't necessarily apply. I understand this is the way it's been done for quite a while now and changing it would upset those that are opposed to change, not matter the reason. I understand this makes the extended scores more difficult and changing it would upset those that are above the old cutoffs, but below the "logical" ones; especially the 8*'s, since the first set of calculations put the 8* higher than the old 9*, which has yet to be achieved (?). I'm not even proposing that we actually change it, I was just curious if this was considered and if there was a reason it was rejected. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Copyright © 2006-2024 ScoreHero, LLC
|
Powered by phpBB
|