| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Goron40
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 510
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:35 pm Post subject: I fear for GH: Metallica |
 |
|
Everyone was expecting Aerosmith to be an easy game, and Neversoft surprised us by overcharting every chart in the game, adding chords where they do not exist, the changed hammer-on system... and don't get me started on random strums.
If they can take a band like Aerosmith and do this... What is to become of GH: Metallica?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrnuzzlespleen
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 1107
Location: The Brooklyn Zoo
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| uhhhh- I just played and beat it, and it WAS really easy. Never below 97% for any song, pretty boring charts until the second to last tier-very much close to what we expected. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schoof 
Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 654
Location: Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject: Re: I fear for GH: Metallica |
|
|
| Goron40 wrote: | | Everyone was expecting Aerosmith to be an easy game, and Neversoft surprised us by overcharting every chart in the game, adding chords where they do not exist, the changed hammer-on system... and don't get me started on random strums. |
Didn't really see much overcharting here, maybe a couple of spots that are weird, but not necessarily overcharted. As for the HO/POs, they were way too easy in GH3, I'm glad that they added a front window for them, you actually have to HO/PO at the right time to hit it.
That being said, I agree that the strums during the solos can be a bit much, if you have to strum once in a while I can live with that, but some of the time it is a bit ridiculous.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GuitarGeek08
Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 3213
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its good that they are making the game easier. Its more fun for the people who arent godly expert players.
_________________
 
I Don't Suck at GH
| Xpertlefty13 quoting me in his Acc Thread wrote: | Honestly, thank you
This is the first real, well thought-out explanation I've seen |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
puppetmaster
Joined: 17 Feb 2007
Posts: 837
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i don't really know how you could mess up GH:Metallica, but seeing how badly they shorted us on songs with GH:A, and how they pretty much left out the entire second half of Aerosmith's career, i guess if there is a way to screw up GH:Metallica, Neversoft may just figure out how to do it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thedevilsreject 
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 2748
Location: Wrexham, Wales, UK
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| puppetmaster wrote: | | they pretty much left out the entire second half of Aerosmith's career |
That would be a good thing in GH:M's case 
_________________
Last edited by thedevilsreject on Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
puppetmaster
Joined: 17 Feb 2007
Posts: 837
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thedevilsreject wrote: | | puppetmaster wrote: | | they pretty much left out the entire second half of Aerosmith's career |
That would be a good thing in GH:M's case [/b] |
good point sir, good point. they can definitely leave out all of St. Anger.  that shit was rubbish. i can deal with all their other stuff though. definitely wouldn't mind seeing "On the Road Again." i liked that cover. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeCoy
Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Posts: 373
Location: Long Island
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
danman1979
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 29
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| puppetmaster wrote: | | thedevilsreject wrote: | | puppetmaster wrote: | | they pretty much left out the entire second half of Aerosmith's career |
That would be a good thing in GH:M's case [/b] |
good point sir, good point. they can definitely leave out all of St. Anger. that shit was rubbish. i can deal with all their other stuff though. definitely wouldn't mind seeing "On the Road Again." i liked that cover. |
Don't you mean "Turn the Page" by Bob Seger? Just checking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dxbrbnk
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 103
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hopefully, GH:M will be a pin off of GH4 not GH3. Meaning, that it will include all band instruments. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MSH-Hitman
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 4481
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: Re: I fear for GH: Metallica |
|
|
| Goron40 wrote: | Everyone was expecting Aerosmith to be an easy game, and Neversoft surprised us by overcharting every chart in the game, adding chords where they do not exist, the changed hammer-on system... and don't get me started on random strums.
If they can take a band like Aerosmith and do this... What is to become of GH: Metallica? |
Exaggerate much? The game had almost zero overcharting, maybe one or two spots, but nothing noticeable. The Hammer on system is just fine too, only slightly different than GH3, but doesn't take long at all to get the hang of it.
After seeing this, I'm really excited for GH: Metallica and hopefully will see if it'll have the full band thing going for it which would be too awesome. They really couldn't have the done the game any better I think. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallidevils
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 60
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it's "turn the page"..and they probably won't bother getting rights to the covers.
I do hope they leave off St Anger. I personally love the loads, but there's no way that they'll put anything besides Fuel on GH:M. There are actually some complex guitar parts to the Loads, but the overall slowness would make them not as fun. Some of those songs are damn hard to play on regular guitar, but it wouldn't translate well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mrnuzzlespleen
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 1107
Location: The Brooklyn Zoo
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| danman1979 wrote: | | puppetmaster wrote: | | thedevilsreject wrote: | | puppetmaster wrote: | | they pretty much left out the entire second half of Aerosmith's career |
That would be a good thing in GH:M's case [/b] |
good point sir, good point. they can definitely leave out all of St. Anger. that shit was rubbish. i can deal with all their other stuff though. definitely wouldn't mind seeing "On the Road Again." i liked that cover. |
Don't you mean "Turn the Page" by Bob Seger? Just checking. |
Yeah, "on the road again" is a Willie Nelson song. come to think of it, a Metallica cover would be REALLY awesome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JB10194
Joined: 24 Mar 2007
Posts: 299
Location: Streator, Illinois
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Guitar Hero: Aerosmith seems to not have any overcharting to me at least. The only thing I fear about Guitar Hero: Metallica is that most of their songs sound similar and I wouldn't really feel like playing some songs that are six minutes or longer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
valioso
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 944
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dxbrbnk wrote: | | Hopefully, GH:M will be a pin off of GH4 not GH3. Meaning, that it will include all band instruments. |
I am pretty sure they will be a full band game since is after GH4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![Inbox [ Login ]](templates/subSilver/images/icon_mini_message.gif){kind=icon}
Inbox [ Login ]
Search
Memberlist
Profile
Log in
