View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JCirri
Joined: 04 Feb 2006 Posts: 4576
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Note Chart |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sully
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 4570 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sully - Cherub Rock Hard SP
I haven't tested this path yet... my original path's FC score was ~8k down from eXcelon's score and I only used 11/12 phrases- this one uses all 12. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CycloneVM
Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 366 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's the same as what I had drawn up just now...also haven't been able to try it out. In your original path, were you going 3-3-2(S1)-1-2? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sully
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 Posts: 4570 Location: Tampa, FL
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I used this path for 416k. The other path uses all 12 phrases and is probably good for 426k. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CycloneVM
Joined: 11 Dec 2006 Posts: 366 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just -2 the outro and got ~409k, so I'm guessing that 426 is possible for someone who doesn't suck at whammying and squeezing (like me). _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheHammer417
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 2178 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i'm still trying to figure out where all those damn points are...fc'd with sully's path and got 419K...i may have been too early on a few activations though _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
killakella0
Joined: 21 Feb 2007 Posts: 22 Location: Schaumburg, Illinois
|
Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sully's path is right, minus a few tweaks which got me 428,450, 200 behind Piso. Other than obviously squeezing, whammying is really important and what will get you the rest of those points |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CholoDrew
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
may not be perfect but o well |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|