ScoreHero
Home | Forum | Wiki
Inbox [ Login ]Inbox [ Login ]
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist
ProfileProfile Log inLog in
Should active euthanasia be legal?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ScoreHero Forum Index -> General Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Brockbfball1563  





Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 3245
Location: Rochester, NH

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:46 am    Post subject: Should active euthanasia be legal? Reply with quote

Edit: Changed topic title to "active euthanasia" instead of "assisted suicide" for clarification.

Active euthanasia - A deliberate act to end another person's life. Generally it is understood that the intentional act of killing someone who would otherwise suffer from an incurable and painful disease. "Passive euthanasia" is simply waiting until the incurable and painful disease kills the person.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Original Post

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPS3pZGthw0&fmt=18

There's been news stories recently about whether or not assisted suicide should be legalized in the UK. Helping someone to kill themself is not usually viewed as a good thing, but what if it's to help someone be put out of their misery? Do you think people shouldn't take the easy way out and just die a natural death?

Should this act be legal, and if so, under what circumstances? The person is in physical pain? Causing emotion pain to the family? Or maybe even he/she is causing extreme financial problems for his/her family just to stay alive?

How do you feel about this situation?
_________________


Last edited by Brockbfball1563 on Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:39 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website XBL Gamertag: vVv Brock
cobainage1994  





Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 2020
Location: Whitewater , WI

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the only circumstance should be if they are in a state in which they have 0% chance of recovery, more or less "Putting them out of their misery."
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message XBL Gamertag: RandyRhoads801
CrackerRiley  





Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 3085

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No. What? I'm just answering the topic title!
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message Send e-mail
Romanczuk  





Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 879
Location: Ross Island, AQ

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Earlier this month it became legal where I am.
It's called the "Death with Dignity Law".
Basically, if you're terminally ill (no chance of making it) and you're just sitting around suffering, you can appeal to the doctors with a relative to back you up and if you get the recommendation from at least two out of three Doctors then you can be prescribed a lethal dose of medication to be put out of your misery.
Seems fair since the doctors and relatives requirement is there to make sure only people who really need it get it.
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
doubleornothin  





Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 266
Location: South Jersey

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think as long as it is done like in the video(or close to it) then assisted suicide should be legal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whitt333  





Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 1535
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No. That is my view on this, and nothing will change. I do agree however, that if you need to depend on machines or medicines to stay alive that you should be able to request to stop using them, or have it in your will.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message XBL Gamertag: Awolter
pryan37bb  





Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 251

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think once you try to legalize it in some situations, it opens the floodgates for people trying to find any justification to do so, and eventually it might as well be legal in all situations (see the Pandora's Box or Slippery Slope arguments).
Personally, I'm against suicide altogether, whether assisted or not. I think someone who wants to commit suicide is someone who is suffering from mental or psychological complications such as clinical depression or bipolar disorder, because who in their right mind would want to take his or her own life? Obviously, not everyone falls under this criterion, eg people in constant pain or with no hope of recovery, as mentioned before, but the line must be drawn. And certainly it's regrettable that people have to live in such situations, but it's better than what would happen if all assisted suicides were legal. People who should be looking up a psychiatrist in the phone book would look up Dr. Kevorkian instead.
EDIT: I agree with the person who posted before me. If you're dependant on machines with no hope of recovery, you should be able to have a proxy, or put it in your will, take you off the machines. But active euthanasia is something that I can never feel comfortable with.


Last edited by pryan37bb on Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:04 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deak2112  





Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 2441
Location: On the wings of a dream, so far beyond reality

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Romanczuk wrote:
Earlier this month it became legal where I am.
It's called the "Death with Dignity Law".
Basically, if you're terminally ill (no chance of making it) and you're just sitting around suffering, you can appeal to the doctors with a relative to back you up and if you get the recommendation from at least two out of three Doctors then you can be prescribed a lethal dose of medication to be put out of your misery.
Seems fair since the doctors and relatives requirement is there to make sure only people who really need it get it.


That's the only situation that it should be. Otherwise, I thought of it like this: Murder is illegal, if you help to murder it's also illegal, suicide is technically illegal, therefore assisting should be illegal. And who's to call the situation as to whether or not it is justified. I don't think the pro's quite outweigh the cons.
_________________

For lulz my Wiki and for My Youtube Channel

Free Bird since 11/9/2009
My only regret is that I only have one life to give for my Lord
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message Visit poster's website PSN Name: Deak2112
rkcr  





Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 2518
Location: Minneapolis

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have trouble with just saying "no" when situations like this one come up. I don't think that anyone wants someone else to choose to take their own life, but there are simply circumstances in which letting a person choose when to go is better for them.
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message Visit poster's website
thecaptainof  





Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 7571
Location: ¯\(°_o)/¯

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rkcr wrote:
I have trouble with just saying "no" when situations like this one come up. I don't think that anyone wants someone else to choose to take their own life, but there are simply circumstances in which letting a person choose when to go is better for them.


Basically this.

My thinking is that, if I were terminally ill or disabled to the point where I couldn't do anything for myself, I know with absolute certainty that I'd want to end the torment as quickly as possible. Therefore if I couldn't end it for myself, I'd want someone else to do it and have them meet no consequences as a result of my wish.
_________________


yksi-kaksi-kolme wrote:
Wow Mr. Mad, who fucked your buffalo?
Back to top
View user's profile Wiki User Page Send private message
Metalteeth  





Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 1131
Location: Columbus, OH

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What the girl in that article says is correct.

Why is it that, if she was a dog, it is considered the "right thing to do" to put then down. As soon as it is a human, we are required to suffer the pain and die in ways we may not want to (like vomiting your own shit....)?

If God truly wants humans to be happy and peaceful, in situations like this, I believe that he would approve of suicide.
_________________
Left Handedness is awesome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message XBL Gamertag: Metalteeth9 PSN Name: Metalteeth9
pyrobob  





Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 880
Location: In a tree in Katy, Tx.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The person doesn't want to live any more. Who has the right to tell someone their not allowed to die?

We have waivers for other things in life, why not write out a quick note with both signatures on it or something saying he was given permission?
_________________
Proud furry. Pet me. Yes, I'm gay. Stop asking. last.fm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Antezin  





Joined: 10 Dec 2008
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rkcr wrote:
I have trouble with just saying "no" when situations like this one come up. I don't think that anyone wants someone else to choose to take their own life, but there are simply circumstances in which letting a person choose when to go is better for them.


Rofl @ the Guitar Hero ad before the vid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
altairian  





Joined: 25 Jan 2008
Posts: 593

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Death is inevitable. It's unreasonable that someone in the situation described in the article linked above cannot choose to die peacefully. I think that requiring the support of a family member and 2 doctors is an entirely reasonable and fair method for approving euthanasia. That will pretty much weed out the cases of mental illness influencing the decision and keep it for only the people that are about to suffer a horrible fate that they don't deserve.
_________________

Feel free to add me on XBL - GT: altairian
Currently working on RB2 guitar, and occasional vox
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail XBL Gamertag: altairian
directshot999  





Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 3838
Location: Birmingham, AL

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If they are speaking on their own account (aren't drunk, doing drugs, or anything that would inhibit regular judgment) then yes, they should be able to die. They're going to find a way out of life anyways, and the other options might not be as pretty as a syringe going into their arm.
_________________
Alabama Crimson Tide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ScoreHero Forum Index -> General Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Copyright © 2006-2024 ScoreHero, LLC
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy


Powered by phpBB