View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
T-Pain


Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Posts: 866
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dont notice that much of a difference... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jonnyg111


Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 658 Location: A House in the Woods
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, if there isn't a timing window, it isn't a rythm game. It's a childrens toy, that tells you which buttons to press, whenever you feel like it. As far as i'm comcerned, the GH2 engine was PERFECT in every way. Noobs can't get good at the game, and pros will always have something hard to work on, no matter how good they get. GH2 will probably always be my favorite GH. _________________
You have died of dysentery. Put in your sig if lemons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Knut


Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 379 Location: Miami, CSI
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:14 pm Post subject: Re: WTF happened to HO/PO in World Tour? |
|
|
Prophet wrote: | I'm glad that the regular HO/PO's are back to the way they should be. It makes it that much more challenging. We won't have so many random people being so freaking amazing at the hardest songs! Or maybe I'm wrong lol. |
What wrong with more than the "elite/core" being good at the game?
---
I don't mind tighter hopos as long as the charts are fun. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SirSire

Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 20 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jonnyg111 wrote: | Well, if there isn't a timing window, it isn't a rythm game. It's a childrens toy, that tells you which buttons to press, whenever you feel like it. As far as i'm comcerned, the GH2 engine was PERFECT in every way. Noobs can't get good at the game, and pros will always have something hard to work on, no matter how good they get. GH2 will probably always be my favorite GH. |
And there's something wrong with new people trying out the game and becoming half decent? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jonnyg111


Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 658 Location: A House in the Woods
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SirSire wrote: | jonnyg111 wrote: | Well, if there isn't a timing window, it isn't a rythm game. It's a childrens toy, that tells you which buttons to press, whenever you feel like it. As far as i'm comcerned, the GH2 engine was PERFECT in every way. Noobs can't get good at the game, and pros will always have something hard to work on, no matter how good they get. GH2 will probably always be my favorite GH. |
And there's something wrong with new people trying out the game and becoming half decent? |
What i'm saying is, people with no rythm are picking up GH3, hitting notes 2 or 4 seconds early/late, and thinking that they are pro.
I'm not saying these people suck, but have you ever seen guys with every song FC'd in GH3 except one and TTFAF, yet they can BARELY 5* misirlou?
There is nothing wrong with new people getting awesome at this game, it's just that it is FAR too easy, and it's messing people up when they play other rythm/GH games. _________________
You have died of dysentery. Put in your sig if lemons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ynomrah


Joined: 08 Dec 2007 Posts: 148
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Venim619 wrote: | People generally complained obout the hammer ons and pull offs in GH3, so it was redone in GH:A and the same engine has been brought to GH:WT. Those of us that preffered the GH2 system will be happy while those who preffered the GH3 system will suffer. Almost a turn of tables since GH3. I would just try to grow used to it. Chances are if you get better at a tight system, you will in turn also get better at the loose system and be a better over all player.
Option A: Be stubborn and return to GH3.
Option B: Learn the new system and become a better player.
Option C: Have sex, get aids, die.
Okay maybe option c isn't the best choice to put in there but if i were you, I'd go for option b. |
option b.  _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SkaterGamer

Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 462 Location: England
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GH2 Ho/Po's are nice.. but GH3's are better.... GH3 will break your fingers in and make them fast enough to pwn GH2 if one were so inclined. (because of the harder charts (which i much much prefer))
I personally get along with every Ho/Po can't tell the difference between GH3 and Aerosmith because I just don't play that way. _________________
Goals:
Reach top 100 on the Xbox Rankings [X]
Reach top 200 Global Rankings [X]
50 Songs Gold Starred [X]
FC GH:Aerosmith [ ]
Check out my GH vids on Utube
http://www.youtube.com/user/Kingpin0072001uk
Me breaking my arm is also on there.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Knut


Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 379 Location: Miami, CSI
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jonnyg111 wrote: | What i'm saying is, people with no rythm are picking up GH3, hitting notes 2 or 4 seconds early/late, and thinking that they are pro. |
It is a video game. So what if they think they are pro. Get over it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jonnyg111


Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 658 Location: A House in the Woods
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Knut wrote: | It is a video game. So what |
I'm done here after this.... this entire forum is devoted to 1 video game. you might as well tell everyone to get over it and stop posting on scorehero.
EDIT: As i've said, i'm done. This is going to turn into a flame war, i'd suggest you stop. _________________
You have died of dysentery. Put in your sig if lemons.
Last edited by jonnyg111 on Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:08 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TylerTheGHBoy

Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 306
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's a HOPO? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigFish

Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 535 Location: Ohio State University
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GH3 hopos are brilliant. It should stay that way. GHA blew in all ways, bad songs, bad charts, bad hopos. GH2 was kind of fun but the hopos were bad in it. Stick with GH3 engine, that's where it's at. That's where it should be. There needs to be room for some error in the game because no one ever plays the actual song the exact same way twice. Get over it that GH3 is superior. _________________
Guitar Hero 3:
FCs ??
TTFAF 517k (I never play it)
477th on 360 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djspinny999

Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 1:56 pm Post subject: WTF |
|
|
So The Game Is Shit
Just Coz Of HO PO Is Harder To Use
:/
Danm
People Are Complaining All Over Scorehero About Problems Wit This Game
What Is The Massive Problm here |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gdubs


Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 651 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BigFish wrote: | There needs to be room for some error in the game because no one ever plays the actual song the exact same way twice. Get over it that GH3 is superior. |
lol
There is room for error in GH2 and Aerosmith. If you can't hit HOPOs in those two but you can in GH3, either you've miscalibrated, or you simply have no rhythm. It's not the game's fault that you're doing it wrong! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Knut


Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 379 Location: Miami, CSI
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jonnyg111 wrote: | Knut wrote: | It is a video game. So what |
I'm done here after this.... this entire forum is devoted to 1 video game. you might as well tell everyone to get over it and stop posting on scorehero. |
There is a difference between including and limited to the "elite" players. And I believe this forum is meant to embrace all of us.
And no you are wrong, this forum is devoted to more than one game, since all of the Guitar Hero (and Rock Band for that matter) are built with different game mechanics. Some people got used to playing GH3 first, does that not give them the "right" to score high in the game because the other games in the series are built differently? Give me a break.
Also, it's a fucking game. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ViolenceFight

Joined: 04 Nov 2007 Posts: 297
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BigFish wrote: | GH3 hopos are brilliant. It should stay that way. GHA blew in all ways, bad songs, bad charts, bad hopos. GH2 was kind of fun but the hopos were bad in it. Stick with GH3 engine, that's where it's at. That's where it should be. There needs to be room for some error in the game because no one ever plays the actual song the exact same way twice. Get over it that GH3 is superior. |
Sorry sir, but in the grand scheme of things you are not entirely correct.
GH2 and GH:A have the better HO/PO system. It makes you better, believe it or not. It took me all of half a day to get used to Aerosmith's HO/PO, because I started with GH3, and was so used to being able to fly wildly and nail hard solos(I'm looking at you, Cult of Personality).
After getting used to it, I LOVED Aerosmith's HO/PO, the same why I love Rock Band's HO/PO. The thing GH:A has over it, is that they are still LOOSE, just not BROKEN like GH3.
GH3 you can hammer onto a note at ANY Time and it'll register, which is stupid. GH:A you have a timing window, although it's still a fairly loose timing window, it is Stricter than GH3, allowing for a more accurate, tough, and fun rhythm game.
As for the Charts and Songs: You KNEW It was all aerosmith, so you can't complain about the songs. That's like buying a best of Metallica Album and bitching that fleetwood mac isn't on it. And the charts were PERFECT. The only major chart problem in that game was TKAR, but everyone knows about that already. _________________
...Sig Coming Soon...Maybe? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Copyright © 2006-2025 ScoreHero, LLC
|
Powered by phpBB
|