View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kinitawowi


Joined: 18 Sep 2007 Posts: 1074 Location: Newham, London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:09 pm Post subject: Alternative Ambient Indie Neo Prog-Punk (or Why Genres Suck) |
|
|
So ever since the Music Forum came into being (and probably long, long before that), there's been a whole wealth of threads dedicated to pretty much every concievable spot on the genre spectrum. And one question has been bugging me; why?
I've never liked genres. Most of the time, they have no real meaning; you could create about sixty new genres of music by perming two fairly basic lists. List 1: "ambient, neo, post, alt, speed, power, thrash, extreme, nu, kraut, progressive, indie, rap, emo"; list 2: "rock, metal, dance, pop, punk, prog, rap, country". Pick one from list 1 and one from list 2, et voila, instant genre! (I know Progressive Prog and Rap Rap would be tautological, but that's the point. And they would probably also be quite funny.)
That's a hundred-odd genres right there, and that's before you start multiplying List 1 entries together ("Extreme Power Metal", anyone?). Can anybody honestly tell all of them apart? And can anybody else name a band who fit entirely and exclusively into one of them? Of course not.
The other problem is that it encourages laziness. Whenever I talk to people about music (and, for that matter, anything else; it's a very common conversation starter), there's always one question that gets asked; "so, what sort of music are you into?" And I've never, ever been able to answer it to anyone's satisfaction, because I listen to what could be considered as "all sorts". For me, the only graduation that's important in music is "music I like" and "music I don't like". Breaking it down further is nigh-on impossible, because most bands don't stick within one genre for all their output; and it's also fairly unimaginative, because it tends to impose a lot of restrictions on what you listen to. "I like Progressive Rock, and that's about it."
And the real point is that the biggest problem with that question is that it's very rarely asked in order to classify music; more often than not it's to classify listeners. "Cool people listen to Alt Punk! You do not listen to Alt Punk, therefore you are not cool!"
It just bugs me.
Thoughts? _________________
My Crapchievements Thread GOAL: The Log [Beast And The Harlot 4.7*]
"Our Father, who art in Heaven... please, stay there." - Saint Etienne, New Thing |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thecaptainof 

Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 7571 Location: ¯\(°_o)/¯
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think all I can really say to that is "pretty much that", which is weird because it's completely at odds with a fair amount of previous rambling... although I've always been terrible at describing music so perhaps it makes no difference either way.
But, really, this:
Quote: | Whenever I talk to people about music (and, for that matter, anything else; it's a very common conversation starter), there's always one question that gets asked; "so, what sort of music are you into?" And I've never, ever been able to answer it to anyone's satisfaction, because I listen to what could be considered as "all sorts". For me, the only graduation that's important in music is "music I like" and "music I don't like". |
That sounds like something I could've written. _________________
yksi-kaksi-kolme wrote: | Wow Mr. Mad, who fucked your buffalo? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheLieInKing


Joined: 20 Oct 2009 Posts: 437 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:02 pm Post subject: Re: Alternative Ambient Indie Neo Prog-Punk (or Why Genres S |
|
|
Some people enjoy categorising music extensively. Whilst I personally can't appreciate this, I can understand it; it's simply a human response. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ensiferum


Joined: 19 Jun 2007 Posts: 202 Location: UW-Madison
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do agree, but only with certain parts of your argument. I agree that any sort of social ladder derived from musical genres is ridiculous. Once people start pulling the "You don't listen to X genre, you are not a true listener or fan" card, then I start to really think whether or not we need all these obscure genres.
Now I won't proclaim myself some sort of genre genius, but I do like to have a little variety in choosing how to describe bands. For me, specific genres make it easier to find similar bands to the ones you enjoy. I may be missing the point, but here's an example in a world with just basic genre descriptions.
Joe: "Hey, Bob, I really like Opeth, can you suggest me some more metal?
Bob: "Metal? Sure, here's some metal; Agalloch, or Deicide?, or Metallica, or (the only relevant one), Katatonia
You could just say that anyone that knows anything about music will be able to sort out bands without genres, but I find them to be useful. Wow, I can't seem to form a coherent thought...sorry. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Twang


Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 2848 Location: The Frost Giant's Cavern
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's for distinguishing styles of music that are fundamentally similar, but generally different, or something like that.
I've never gotten the hang-up that you (and many other people) have with the different classifications and genres. It's just an organization method, nothing more, nothing less. They really only have as much meaning as you give them.
I'd rather have 30 topics named "Ambient Dance," "Neo-Country," "Thrash Rap," "Post-Pop" or "Progressive Indie Punk," etc. than 30 topics named "Music I Like" or "Music I Don't Like, But You Might." That would be so counter-intuitive, because you would not be able to keep track of anything and all topics would pretty much be the same (in that they're so wildly different) and even more arbitrary.
Ensiferum wrote: |
I do agree, but only with certain parts of your argument. I agree that any sort of social ladder derived from musical genres is ridiculous. Once people start pulling the "You don't listen to X genre, you are not a true listener or fan" card, then I start to really think whether or not we need all these obscure genres. |
I agree that people like that suck, but what does that have to do with the genres? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GuitarHailz 


Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 4910 Location: Austin, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:44 pm Post subject: Re: Alternative Ambient Indie Neo Prog-Punk (or Why Genres S |
|
|
TheLieInKing wrote: | Some people enjoy categorising music extensively. Whilst I personally can't appreciate this, I can understand it; it's simply a human response. |
This is similar to what I was going to say. Genres need to exist to prevent total chaos, as categorization is just a natural habit of people. But on the flip side, while genres are a necessary evil, genre elitism is one of the most annoying things about visiting this forum. As much as I love music, people who argue over genres and judge songs or bands based on the genres or mix of genres they belong to all but ruin this forum for me. It's a constant battle genre-know-it-alls, which really gets old after a while especially considering the abstract-ness of genres in general. It's like listening to art critics argue about the meaning of a painting. Who cares? What you think is the only opinion that matters in this case.
If someone asked me what genres I like I'd probably have an answer similar to cap'n and the OP. I can sample bits of almost everything and find something I like.
Personally I wish there could be a rule of sorts in this forum about genre elitism and genre arguments... but of course it would be difficult to spell out and even worse to enforce. I just wish others could be open to the fact that no single artist can possibly belong to a single genre, and that genres are utterly and completely subjective.
So as a categorization method, genres are fine, as Twang said. But as a label that people use as "evidence" to like or dislike music, it's a terrible limit to have on music. The genre elitists and music "experts" use genre labels as the basis for their entire arguments for hating or loving a band. That's what is so annoying and actually downright sad. "I won't even listen to this song, it's labeled as country!" etc
Like, if I said Metallica is metal, I'd have some holier-than-thou music king descend upon the thread to grant us all with their infinite knowledge of music and genres and make sure we know Metallica is hard rock (in their opinion of course). In short, I believe the point of this thread is: Genres aren't the be all to end all of what music is. They don't "suck," but the baggage they come with and the way people react to the genre of something is what makes them a bad thing at times.
Partially repetitive post, but that's how I roll.  _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kinitawowi


Joined: 18 Sep 2007 Posts: 1074 Location: Newham, London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
See, I get the human instinct to label and categorise. That's fine; as has been noted, it can be quite beneficial when:
1) labels aren't used as a tool for derogation, and
2) the gaps between boxes are wide enough for the labels to retain meaning.
As an example, let's take the thread that truly inspired this post; the Post-Rock thread. I've read through it a few times, and seen what else people have discussed in there, and I can't find any meaningful difference between what gets called "post rock" and what gets called "ambient rock". So the question becomes, why bother? Using the genre as a means of categorising music falls down when the lines between the genres are too blurred (which is inevitable when there's so many genres - and, more problematically, sub-genres), and that's the thought from which this thread is rooted.
Let's also look at Ensiferum's hypothetical.
Quote: | I may be missing the point, but here's an example in a world with just basic genre descriptions.
Joe: "Hey, Bob, I really like Opeth, can you suggest me some more metal?
Bob: "Metal? Sure, here's some metal; Agalloch, or Deicide?, or Metallica, or (the only relevant one), Katatonia |
The fundamental problem is that Joe has asked the wrong question; far better would be "Bob, can you suggest anyone else maybe kinda like Opeth that I might like?". As you said, any Bob that knows anything about music will be able to sort the bands out; anyone who doesn't probably shouldn't be asked either question in the first place.
TL;DR: I want to listen to some thrash country now. _________________
My Crapchievements Thread GOAL: The Log [Beast And The Harlot 4.7*]
"Our Father, who art in Heaven... please, stay there." - Saint Etienne, New Thing |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Twang


Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 2848 Location: The Frost Giant's Cavern
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, there is a difference (albeit subtle) between ambient music and post-rock. Post-rock is a progression of rock music, highly influenced by ambient music (to the point where, as you said, they're hard to tell from each other). The reason they're both included in the same thread is they provide similar experiences, and their fanbases overlap.
I don't claim to be an expert on either genre, however. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
machchunk


Joined: 28 Oct 2006 Posts: 3829 Location: Pasco, WA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
topic title wrote: | Who Genres Suck |
Few people in this forum are mature enough to use them. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eyewin8


Joined: 11 Aug 2006 Posts: 2790
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
People ask me about what kind of music I like and I just say ">everything but country and rap"
But really, I don't really care much on genre whoring. It classifies the music, so it has some purpose. I only have a problem with it when people try and list these obscure subgenres that nobody has ever heard of, when they could have easily just said it sounded like a main genre _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GIRLintheFIRE

Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 139
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:29 am Post subject: Re: Alternative Ambient Indie Neo Prog-Punk (or Why Genres S |
|
|
Kinitawowi wrote: | So ever since the Music Forum came into being (and probably long, long before that), there's been a whole wealth of threads dedicated to pretty much every concievable spot on the genre spectrum. And one question has been bugging me; why? |
There's so many threads created because there are a lot of people on this message board that enjoy listening to music with different tastes from everyone else that want to talk about what they like. There's no problem with that whatsoever. The problem occurs is when people start rehashing topics. Right now there are maybe 3 or 4 threads that I can shove my Nirvana fancy in and it would be okay.
Kinitawowi wrote: | I've never liked genres. Most of the time, they have no real meaning; |
Oh yes they do.
Kinitawowi wrote: | you could create about sixty new genres of music by perming two fairly basic lists. List 1: "ambient, neo, post, alt, speed, power, thrash, extreme, nu, kraut, progressive, indie, rap, emo"; list 2: "rock, metal, dance, pop, punk, prog, rap, country". Pick one from list 1 and one from list 2, et voila, instant genre! ... ... ... |
It's not an 'instant genre.' You'd just be coming up with some name for something that already exists. They exist for a reason. Enough bands start to sound different enough from where the genre started out that it's not the same thing anymore. Take Melodic Death Metal for instance. Melodeath is a long way away from regular Death Metal, so what's the point in calling them the same thing? In Flames is obviously MUCH different than a band such as Bloodbath.
There's also the influential take on it that have to do with eras.
Start with Heavy Metal.
Add a bunch of hardcore punk influence and you get Thrash Metal.
Add a bunch more hardcore punk and you get Crossover Thrash Metal.
Crossover is MUCH different than Heavy Metal alone, so if you were to abolish genres then you'd have no way of telling what someone wanted if they asked for 'metal.'
Kinitawowi wrote: | Can anybody honestly tell all of them apart? And can anybody else name a band who fit entirely and exclusively into one of them? Of course not. |
Yes, people can tell them apart. Sometimes it takes a more experienced ear than most. Most of bands fit exclusively into one genre. Most of Thrash bands fit into Thrash alone because Thrash is such a touchy genre. Any tweak of it and you're immediately a blend, such as Death Thrash or Black Thrash.
Kinitawowi wrote: | And the real point is that the biggest problem with that question is that it's very rarely asked in order to classify music; more often than not it's to classify listeners. "Cool people listen to Alt Punk! You do not listen to Alt Punk, therefore you are not cool!" |
That's just called being childish.
Kinitawowi wrote: | Thoughts? |
Yes! I'm one of those that like to classify music. I do it for the purposes of being able to discuss certain types of music and to be able to look for more music that sounds like what I want more of.
Say I want Dubstep as opposed to DrumNBass. I can Google (or ask someone about) "Dubstep" and get exactly what I want rather than sifting through hundreds of bands that all fit the category of "Electronic" to get what I want.
Or maybe we should call every single band "music" and just leave it at that. I imagine that will be fun  _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Southparkhero


Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3251 Location: Some place in NJ.
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
On /mu/ (OMG 4CHAN IT MUST BE BAD!!!! <_<) I've heard some crazy genres like Ambient punk post hardcore or something like that. I think its rediculous.
Edit: LOL
Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)15:22 No.7292125
0-15 Nothing
16 Guns and roses
17-20 Nothing again
21 not hit songs from one hit electronic music musicians
22-23 some house, trance and jungle songs that i found on net
24- chiptune, house, funeral doom metal, casiocore, progressive metal, drone doom metal, trance, industrial, digital hardcore, volta do mar, crime in choir
25- progressive metal, ambient, dark ambient,casiocore, chiptune, house, funeral doom metal, drone doom metal, trance, industrial, digital hardcore, crime in choir, volta do mar, _________________
sdfadf |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bmad965

Joined: 16 May 2009 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:49 am Post subject: Re: Alternative Ambient Indie Neo Prog-Punk (or Why Genres S |
|
|
GIRLintheFIRE wrote: | Kinitawowi wrote: | Can anybody honestly tell all of them apart? And can anybody else name a band who fit entirely and exclusively into one of them? Of course not. |
Yes, people can tell them apart. Sometimes it takes a more experienced ear than most. Most of bands fit exclusively into one genre. Most of Thrash bands fit into Thrash alone because Thrash is such a touchy genre. Any tweak of it and you're immediately a blend, such as Death Thrash or Black Thrash. |
Bands can change their sound though. For example, Metallica started as thrash metal, but slowed it down a bit on The Black Album. If you broaden the classification it's still metal, but you can't nail their career into a very specific genre.
Also I definitely agree that there are far too many genres out there. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
munkyzero


Joined: 18 Jul 2007 Posts: 2482 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:27 am Post subject: Re: Alternative Ambient Indie Neo Prog-Punk (or Why Genres S |
|
|
"3. Cakecore"
Damn, if only that was real. <_<
On topic: as with most everything else, genres are obviously not bad things, but there are just some people who take them too far. _________________
BUTTS BUTTS BUTTS BUTTS BUTTS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sixen


Joined: 11 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201 Location: Johnstown, NY
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think unless its after the word "hard", core should never be used in genre names.
from: http://en.allexperts.com/e/l/li/list_of_music_genres_suffixed_-core.htm
* ArtCore- Know for use by Dustin. Shelton, and Chris.
* AfroCore- Also known as Marsvoltacore
* Acidcore - an alternative name for freeform hardcore.
* Breakcore - fusion of hardcore, jungle and techno AKA Noizecore
* Christcore - Christian hardcore punk or metalcore.
* Cuddlecore - punk-influenced twee pop
* Darkcore - style of hardcore techno
* Discore - alternate term for D-Beat punk.
* Drillcore - a cross between breakcore and drill 'n bass
* Emocore - later and better known as emo
* Emo-Metalcore - fusion of metalcore and emo
* Funcore - a term used by Dutch based Babyboom Records label to describe bouncy techno
* Folkcore - fusion of hardcore punk and folk music
* Funkcore - fusion of hardcore punk and funk
* Glamcore - fusion of riot grrl, thrash metal, and glam rock
* Gloomcore - simple music, with a story that usually has to do something with drugs
* Gorecore - goregrind played in a more traditional grindcore style
* Gothcore - fusion of hardcore punk and gothic music
* Grindcore - a thrashcore/crossover thrash hybrid
* Happycore - variety of swift, hard trance music AKA Happy Hardcore
* Hatecore - white power hardcore punk
* Hopcore - fusion of hardcore punk and hip hop music
* Homocore - alternate term for queercore
* Horrorcore - style of hip hop with graphically violent and sexual lyrics
* Horror hardcore a style of Misfits influenced hardcore punk
* Japcore - Japanese hardcore punk
* Mathcore - a fusion of metalcore and math rock
* Metalcore - fusion of hardcore punk and heavy metal
* Nerdcore - style of hip hop with nerd-themed lyrics
* Noisecore - a largely anti-technical, anti-clean sounding form of grindcore, sometimes an alternate term for noise music AKA Breakcore
* Norsecore - style of black metal
* Polkacore - fusion of hardcore punk and polka
* Popcore - fusion of hardcore punk and pop punk
* Punkcore - anarchistic hardcore techno mixed with punk rock samples
* Queercore - style of hardcore punk with gay and lesbian-themed lyrics
* Raggacore - fusion of breakcore and ragga
* Rapcore - fusion of punk, heavy metal, hip hop, and funk
* Sadcore - style of late '80s indie rock with sadness and loneliness-themed lyrics
* Skacore - fusion of hardcore punk and ska punk
* Skatecore - alternate term for skate punk
* Slowcore - alternate term for sadcore
* Sludgecore - a music style similar to sludge metal
* Speedcore - music with very fast bpm (250bpm and faster)
* Spazzcore - term for over-the-top spastic and volatile punk.
* Synthcore - alternative name for electroclash that never found popularity. also a type of coldwave without guitars.
* Stenchcore - early term for crust punk
* Terrorcore - a subgenre of hardcore techno with "scary" or horror themed samples
* Thrashcore - fast(er) hardcore punk
* Trancecore - uplifting and epic music, close to freeform
* Twangcore - alternate term for alternative country
* Yardcore - an alternative name for raggacore
* Thugcore - fusion of hip hop and metalcore or hardcore punk
These are all ridiculously stupid of you ask me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Copyright © 2006-2025 ScoreHero, LLC
|
Powered by phpBB
|