Can we enforce Proof for new #1 scores?

**Anthony** · Joined: 03 Mar 2006 Posts: 659 Location: Cali

I think it should be required. I'm not even close to getting a top 5 scores but if I did I definitely would take a picture.
_________________

**MetalMadness** · Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 1095

I think it should be required. It doesn't take long to figure out how to get the pics on a computer and then upload to imageshack. Especially if they're new.

krim - that banner is awesome

only 490 to go!
_________________

**ES942** · Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 3445 Location: Snalbans

i think it should be. check out Phinny's Coywboys from hell score. >

**KetchuponEggs** · Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 864 Location: Scott AFB, IL

i agree with the majority, proof should be mandatory.

Its not that hard to get...besides, who wouldn't want to post a pic/vid of their high score run?
_________________

The difference between kinky and perverse - using a feather, or the whole damn chicken.

<Fenster> eh
<Fenster> 89 is only 7 less
<Fenster> what's 7 quite bitter beings when you already have 89
* You were kicked from #toys by Echelar (MAGIC PENIS BOX-HO)

**Genga** · Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 2474 Location: Glasgow, Scotland

**random** · Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 59

I don't think proof is too much to ask for a #1 score. A score without a pic could stay for a week or so, if the person didn't have immediate access to a camera. That would give them time to find a camera and at least take a picture of the scores page or something.

I hate not knowing whether it's worth my time to look for more points in a song where the high score is unproven. Often when the top score is unproven and seems too high, somebody eventually ends up beating it with proof, but not always, and I'd hate to waste hours trying to beat one that was impossible.

**rabies** · Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:35 pm Post subject: