View previous topic :: View next topic |
Should JCirri enforce proof for #1 scores? |
Yes |
|
85% |
[ 29 ] |
No |
|
14% |
[ 5 ] |
|
Total Votes : 34 |
|
Author |
Message |
Anthony
Joined: 03 Mar 2006 Posts: 659 Location: Cali
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it should be required. I'm not even close to getting a top 5 scores but if I did I definitely would take a picture. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MetalMadness
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 1095
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it should be required. It doesn't take long to figure out how to get the pics on a computer and then upload to imageshack. Especially if they're new.
krim - that banner is awesome
only 490 to go! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ES942
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 3445 Location: Snalbans
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think it should be. check out Phinny's Coywboys from hell score. > |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KetchuponEggs
Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 864 Location: Scott AFB, IL
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
i agree with the majority, proof should be mandatory.
Its not that hard to get...besides, who wouldn't want to post a pic/vid of their high score run? _________________
The difference between kinky and perverse - using a feather, or the whole damn chicken.
<Fenster> eh
<Fenster> 89 is only 7 less
<Fenster> what's 7 quite bitter beings when you already have 89
* You were kicked from #toys by Echelar (MAGIC PENIS BOX-HO) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Genga
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 2474 Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
random
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think proof is too much to ask for a #1 score. A score without a pic could stay for a week or so, if the person didn't have immediate access to a camera. That would give them time to find a camera and at least take a picture of the scores page or something.
I hate not knowing whether it's worth my time to look for more points in a song where the high score is unproven. Often when the top score is unproven and seems too high, somebody eventually ends up beating it with proof, but not always, and I'd hate to waste hours trying to beat one that was impossible. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rabies
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 2442 Location: Columbia, Maryland
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
random wrote: |
I hate not knowing whether it's worth my time to look for more points in a song where the high score is unproven. Often when the top score is unproven and seems too high, somebody eventually ends up beating it with proof, but not always, and I'd hate to waste hours trying to beat one that was impossible. |
Amen |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|